Hello my dears,
I was told earlier, that there is actually a difference between various Ravenclaws, and distinct personalities. The first of these assumptions, was that many traits belong to many different sharply minded students, and that some do not actually belong in the house. I was led by the suggestion to believe that students really belong to a variety of houses without any question, and that, perhaps, if one was multi-faceted, they could belong to any number of houses. Blessing told me earlier today that I am just as much suited for Gryffindor as I am for Ravenclaw, but I am not sure that is necessarily true. I apparently have a really wide mouth that never knows when to stop when it begins to flap, and I cannot actually help it. My brashness is gleaned from my Chaldean heritage, and it is not my fault if I do not always seem meek and humble. Perhaps I do not want to actually seem meek and humble- perhaps I am not actually humble.
Well, according to Biblical teachings I should be humble, and that is fine. I certainly do not wear my feelings on my sleeve, so that’s something I guess. However, I cannot make light of the suggestion that I am no longer a part of that esteemed, noble house of Ravenclaw, in the confused minds encircling my life. I merely do not feel as tough. I belong with the Gryffindors, and, there’s nothing I can do about that! Ha. The creativity and the zeal and the intelligence of Luna Lovegood I could never admit to any one person, to any venue or lovely, willing to listen ear- there are not many of those, ha, not where I am concerned- to me- I cannot draw back from that esteemed house, that esteemed person. There is but one small facet of my true nature that relieves me of any unnecessary burden of those rash Gryffindors, and that is a creative penchant. I could not live without art, music, and literature, and that one but unique treasure is what I hold.
And I am not rash. Merely strong. Foolish notion.
Perhaps my other fellow peers and professors would like to consider themselves removed from the brashness of the Gryffindors. But perhaps my friends, we need to look further than this. Perhaps there is a plethora of beautiful walks of imagery and loveliness that flank around us with an enormous complexity, telling of every small different facet of our truest selves. Perhaps not one of us belongs to any one class, and we all hold some of each. I still maintain that the complexity must only be tempered with a stoic and regal pride in the house of Ravenclaw, and I don’t think that many people can actually play the cards of such regal backstabbers. There are all types of intelligence, interests, and talent. Harry and Luna had talent, but Hermione merely had genius. The two are inherently different. Factual knowledge is something that Professor Trelawney never understood . . .
Luna and I never understood it either.
Signed,
Emerald ~
I take offense at Hermione "merely" had genius. She was the greatest witch of her age. And, yes, while genius and talent are different things, I do not believe Hermione was a genius; frequently in the book we saw her working to achieve her great goals. She had inherent talent as well, in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteOkay, fair enough- explain one thing to me though. You are from all counts that you have given, from my discussions with you, 'not a Harry Potter fan.' Then how is it that one personal perspective on one of the character- which by the way doesn't reflect any other person's except mine- can offend you? She would need to reflect your individual person in some sense, and I fail to see how that is the case. Additionally, I really think that 'the greatest witch of her age,' is pretty broad statement. Wouldn't the very idea that she is the greatest witch of her age brink upon personal opinion? Honestly, there are people all over Harry Potter fandom debating the differences between Hermione and Luna, and who was in fact the greater witch. The very fact that it is up for debate automatically makes the statement subjective. This posting merely reflects my own opinion on the matter, and I happent to believe- no offense intended- that she had more genius than talent.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, the fact that characters and their qualities are debatable and subjective is common knowledge. JK Rowling put the characters out there so that we can comment upon them and take them in stride; it is only natural that we all have different perspectives on them. We are also fortunate enough, thanks to Rowling, to be able to voice them in public ways. Questioning this in a specific author's work just doesn't make sense. It would be the same as pointing out that an employee getting paid the same as twenty employees, is actually getting a different wage- author's in the HP group are in this sense the same. We are all level in our abilities.
ReplyDelete1) I was joking about the offended bit. Please believe me, if there was an internet sarcasm icon, I would abuse it to death.
ReplyDelete2) Sirius Black said it in book three. Not me. If you want to take offense at me saying "greatest witch of her age" and calling it personal opinion you're going to have to talk to Sirius.
3) I am, in no way, shape, or form, insulting Luna Lovegood. She is definitely one of my favorite female characters. I was just saying I don't feel you gave Hermione enough credit. You think Luna is a better witch? I'm not going to stand in your way. I don't have an opinion on that one way or the other. I just feel that Hermione has more than just genius; she has talent, too. Am I allowed to have an opinion on this?
4) I am very, truly sorry, if my earlier comment sounded negative or insulting.
5) I do not understand your second comment in its entirety and have decided to go back to bed now and bow out of this conversation because I am obviously becoming a troll, which has never and will never be my intent.
Hi Rebekah,
ReplyDeleteOkay, I am giving you a free ticket to call me anything along the lines of 'idiot' that you can think of. I was unnaturally stressed when you wrote that comment and was stretched to an unbearable point at that instant. I simply was not thinking clearly, and took your words at face value, an act which now makes me feel like a complete imbecile. My political side was raging last night, and it turned crass due to my lack of sleep, with you as the unlucky target- please ignore my second comment completely. And, you are certainly free to an opinion, as that is what this blog is all about. I hope I have not offended you so bad that I turned you away from reading, as I really do appreciate your support. I just needed some sleep when I wrote this.
Again, I am so sorry! Please, let us be friends? :)
No worries! I was actually panicking over here because I hadn't seen you in rage-mode before and I was like, "What did I do!?!? What have I done?!?!"
ReplyDeleteI do like this blog, I didn't mention before--it's interesting to see your viewpoints of Harry Potter in regards to life and epiphanies :)